SDA Retirement Village Complex

Planning Consultation Forum for the Proposed Retirement Village Complex at 131-173
Central Road Nunawading
Over 160 submissions have been received by Whitehorse City Council in opposition to the
proposal to build seven multi-storey buildings containing 151 residential units, an
auditorium, café and shop with associated road, path, fence and car park construction.
All-in-all over 80 trees, mostly indigenous, will be removed if this development goes ahead.
According to the Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO) placed on the land by council
in 2008:
‘ … The site contains remnant native vegetation of very high local conservation
significance. This includes the presence of:
– A remnant of the endangered Ecological Vegetation Class (Valley Heathy Forest) with
Very High conservation significance rating and habitat score in excess of 0.4.
– Large hollow bearing trees.
– 15 plant species of bioregional conservation significance

This site of botanical significance plays an important role in contributing to the biodiversity
of the area around Blackburn Lake Sanctuary.  This Ecological Vegetation Class is severely
threatened to the extent that records indicate only about 470 hectares remain out of the
20,000 hectares that may have existed in the Gippsland Plain Bioregion.  Any
development, particularly subdivision, within the property needs to be appropriately
managed to ensure the long- term protection and sustainability of this biodiversity …’

This land is considered so important it is the only site in Whitehorse to have an
Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO1) and a Significant Landscape Overlay (SLO5)
applied to it.  Indeed it is one of only two sites in Whitehorse with Environmental
Significance Overlays (the other being 15 Virgillia St. Blackburn North).

The Consultation Forum was held on Tuesday 29 October with over eighty concerned
members of the Whitehorse community in attendance.  The forum, organised by Council
and mediated by Mr. Bruce Turner, aimed to:
‘ … Generate a shared understanding of the proposal and any issues and concerns
from all perspectives and to explore ways that the concerns might be addressed …’

A multitude of issues and concerns were raised by the community (the meeting lasted for
over 3.5 hours!) yet the responses from the representatives for the proponent were minimal
or rambling and for the most part evasive.   So the last aim of the forum was not achieved
i.e. there was very little exploration of ways that the concerns about the development
might be addressed.

The Tree Society had a list of 25 questions on the environmental impacts of the
development.  However, only one of these questions was answered (it was confirmed that
80 trees were to be destroyed in the construction of the retirement village).  Our list of
questions and concerns will be forwarded to Council’s Planning Department in the hope
that answers will be provided and reason prevails.

Other community representatives raised the following issues in relation to the proposed
unsympathetic overdevelopment of the site:
• Scale, character and visual amenity (particularly in reference to Cromwell Court
residents and the Central Road frontage)
• Other environmental impacts (e.g. impacts on Blackburn Lake Sanctuary, noise,
fumes, lighting, exhaust fumes and litter)
• traffic, parking and safety; drainage, built surfaces and other infrastructure and
construction impacts

Council will make a final decision on the proposal in February/March 2014.

Interested in reading more? Click here for a full copy of the  Newsletter November 2013

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s